|
The Plate Layouts for the
1902 Series of U.S. Stamps
Straight-Edge
Possibilities:
400 Subject Plates - 1¢ to 15¢ - Left, right, top
or bottom or two adjacent sides
200 Subject Plates - 15¢ to $5 - Left or right
only
|
|
Three Plate Layouts
The 1902 Series was printed on soft porous
double-line USPS watermarked paper using three
plate layouts. The 1¢ to 15¢ stamps were printed using the
400 subject plate layout shown at right. Some of the later
15¢ stamps and all of the higher denominations, the 30¢
through the $5, were printed using the 200 subject plate
layout (below). The 1¢ and the 2¢ redesign were printed on
180-subject sheets to produce booklet stamps.
The 400 subject sheet was cut along both "Cut Lines" or
guidelines into four panes of 100
stamps before distribution to post offices. The sheets
were not perforated along the guidelines and straight-edges may
appear on any side or even on the two adjacent sides where the
guidelines intersect. Imperforate sheets of 400 were
issued intact.
Each pane has two imprint and plate markings, for a
total of eight for the entire sheet. Plate Blocks may be found
at all four positions, top, bottom, left and right.
The watermark orientation for these stamps is horizontal, that
is in the non-rotated state as described on this
page. To put it another way, the watermark may be
normal or reversed or even upside down but not on its side.
This is important, because early printings of the 15¢ stamp
on 200 subject sheets can be told from the later 400 subject
printings by this fact; the watermarks on the 200 subject
printings will be on their side.
|
|

|
|
Which stamp is the early printing?
I can't wait ...
If you have read the left hand column you
should already be able to easily determine which stamp is
which.
The early stamp, from the
200-subject plate, has perforations along its horizontal
guideline. This is a dead giveaway, since stamps from the 400-subject sheets were
cut, and not perforated, along both
guidelines. Although it is possible a stamp may have had
perforations fraudulently added along a top or bottom guideline straight-edge, this
tom-foolery is unlikely to trap the knowledgeable collector. Note that the Series of 1902 stamps
will never be found perforated along the left or right
guideline. A stamp with such perforations has obviously been altered.
By the same token, a stamp with a straight-edge along the left
or right guideline does not identify a 200- or 400-subject
plate layout. Only perforations along the top or bottom
guideline will distinguish this.
Further separating the stamps is the difference in size. The
design on the stamp on the right is clearly shorter, as well
as wider, than the stamp on the left. Since the paper for the
200-subject sheets was placed in the press sideways compared
to the 400-subject sheets, the
grain of the paper was horizontal rather than vertical, and the shrinkage in the
stamp was from top to bottom, rather than the normal left to
right.
This lead to another identifying feature, the
watermarks on the 200-subject sheet stamps were also sideways
(sometimes referred to as "vertical"). See watermark
orientations for more on this. All of the high value
stamps of the 1902 Series have sideways double-line USPS
watermarks.
Answer to the quiz: The
stamp on the right is from the early 200-subject printing.
|
|
|
Higher Denomination Stamps
Since the demand for the higher denomination
stamps was less than for the lower denominations, it made
sense to use a smaller plate layout. These sheets were
normally cut along the vertical guideline to make a left and
right pane of
100. The demand for the $1, $2 and $5 stamps was quite low
however, and these sheets were normally divided into even
smaller panes before delivery to post offices. Panes of 100
that were delivered intact still had the horizontal guidelines
and arrows. Blocks containing these arrows bring a slight
premium and are known on all the higher denominations.
The paper for the 200 stamp sheets was placed in the printing press
sideways as compared to the 400 stamp sheets and this had the
effect of turning the watermarks on their sides. This is often
referred to as "vertical" orientation although we
prefer the term "sideways".
In addition, the higher denomination stamps, printed on the
200-subject sheets, were wider and shorter than their 400-subject counterparts. This was due to the horizontal
grain of the paper, with the shrinkage being in the direction
of the height of the stamp.
|
|
|
|
Booklet Pane
The booklet pane plates were similar to the 200-subject
plates, except there are 9 rows
instead of 10. There are no "Bureau of Engraving and
Printing" imprints, but there are two plate numbers. If you
look closely, you will see a plate number above the right stamp
of pane 7 and below the left stamp of pane 24. The bottom plate
number and guideline arrow were normally removed when the sheet
was cut to make the panes, but the top arrow and plate number
often survived in the larger top margin needed for binding.
As can be seen, there are 30 panes per sheet. Since these sheets
had the same horizontal and vertical guidelines as the 200 and
400-subject sheets, there are nine distinct collectible
positions. Positions B, C, F and G bring a small premium over
the more common positions A and E. Positions H and I do not
bring a premium, but position D, the only position with the
plate number intact, brings a substantial premium, particularly
plate number 3472, which for some reason was placed over the left stamp
instead of the right.
|
|

|
References:
|
|
The United States Postage Stamps of the 20th Century Volume 1,
Max Johl 1937
|
|
United States Stamp Booklets, Robert Furman 1999
|
|
Scott 2003 Specialized Catalog of U.S. Stamps and Covers
|
|
The Cheshire Collection of United States 1902-1908 Issues, Robert
A. Siegel Auction Galleries Inc., Sale 873 March, 2004
|
|
2002 Rarities of the World, Robert A. Siegel Auction Galleries
Inc., Sale 846 March, 2002
|
|
How to Detect Damaged, Altered and Repaired Stamps, Paul W.
Schmid 1996
|
|
|